Individual Pogo Pin
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →
Custom 10-pin right-angle pogo pin connector with a 5 × 2 dual-row spring-contact arrangement and bent PCB tails. The right-angle architecture allows the contact interface and PCB termination to operate in different directions, supporting device layouts where a straight connector geometry does not match the required mating direction. Contact pitch, PCB footprint, working stroke and electrical ratings are defined by the approved project drawing.
Determine whether the project needs a single spring-loaded contact, a multi-contact connector assembly, a specific mounting method or a customer-defined mechanical interface.
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →A complete multi-contact assembly combining pogo pins, insulating housing, contact pitch and mounting structure.
Browse Connector Assemblies →Choose through-hole, surface mount, right-angle, double-ended or customer-specific termination.
Review Engineering Guides →Define travel, spring force, current path, housing, Pin Map and device-side mechanical constraints.
Submit Project Requirements →This 10-pin right-angle pogo pin connector integrates ten spring-loaded electrical contacts into a compact 5 × 2 dual-row housing with bent PCB tails. The right-angle architecture changes the relationship between the mating direction and PCB termination direction, making it suitable for interface layouts where a straight connector geometry does not match the required device orientation.
Each spring-loaded contact provides electrical connection and controlled compliance along its contact axis. Final mechanical seating, compression and connector position should be established by the PCB, enclosure and mating structure rather than by using the pogo contacts as structural stops.
Ten spring-loaded contacts are arranged as five positions across two parallel rows. The integrated housing maintains the relative contact positions as one connector assembly rather than requiring ten individual pogo contacts to be installed separately.
Exact contact pitch, row spacing, pin numbering and mating-pad coordinates should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before PCB layout release.
The bent-tail structure creates a right-angle relationship between the spring-contact interface and the PCB termination geometry. This can support device architectures where the mating interface needs to face toward the side of a PCB or enclosure rather than directly above the board.
Right-angle geometry should be evaluated together with PCB edge position, enclosure clearance, mating direction and available X/Y/Z installation space.
The visible connector structure uses elongated bent PCB tails consistent with through-hole integration. Final PCB finished-hole diameter, pad dimensions, tail diameter, bend geometry and insertion depth should follow the approved connector and PCB drawings.
The bent tails should not be dimensioned from product photography because small changes in bend radius or tail position can affect PCB fit and connector alignment.
The connector should be reviewed together with the PCB edge, mating target, enclosure opening and device-level mechanical datums. The PCB and housing structure should control the final connector position and mating relationship.
Each pogo contact should operate within the working stroke specified by the approved connector drawing. Working stroke is different from total available mechanical travel.
Device-level mechanical stops should define the final mating position. The pogo contacts are intended to provide controlled electrical-contact compliance, not to act as structural stops.
Ten physical contacts provide ten available electrical positions, but the pin count does not determine their functions. Power, return, control, sensing, identification or signal assignments should be established through the approved customer pin map.
Pin numbering should clearly indicate the viewing direction because a right-angle connector can create additional orientation ambiguity between the PCB side and mating side.
Current capability should be evaluated across the complete conductive path:
Source → PCB → through-hole solder joint → bent tail → pogo contact → mating interface → target conductor → load.
Pin count or visible contact diameter alone is not sufficient to establish an approved current rating. PCB copper, solder joints, tail geometry, contact resistance, mating resistance and temperature rise should be included in the electrical review.
Multiple contacts may be evaluated in parallel for a project-specific electrical architecture, but total current should not be calculated by simply multiplying one contact rating by the number of parallel contacts.
PCB routing, solder-joint resistance, contact resistance variation, mating geometry and current sharing should be reviewed together.
A 10-pin connector does not automatically provide a specific data bandwidth or communication protocol.
Signal performance depends on the approved pin map, ground and return-path allocation, contact geometry, pitch, PCB transition, mating target and the complete electrical channel.
This right-angle connector architecture can be evaluated for PCB-mounted electrical interfaces requiring ten spring-contact positions where the desired mating direction differs from the PCB termination direction.
Suitability should be determined from the PCB position, enclosure geometry, mating target, contact assignment, working stroke, electrical conditions and mechanical tolerance.
Plating, corrosion performance, cycle life, operating temperature and compliance status should only be published when supported by approved material specifications or validation records.
A gold-colored contact surface does not by itself establish a gold-plating specification, plating thickness or corrosion rating.
CTP can review project-specific requirements for contact count, dual-row spacing, housing dimensions, right-angle tail geometry, PCB footprint, working stroke, spring-force condition, pin assignment and mating-interface geometry.
Final connector dimensions and electrical specifications should be released through an approved drawing.
The connector uses a 5 × 2 dual-row architecture with ten spring-loaded contact positions integrated into one housing.
The bent-tail architecture creates an approximately 90-degree relationship between the contact interface and the PCB termination direction. This allows the mating interface to face toward the side of a PCB or enclosure.
It is a multi-contact pogo pin connector assembly. Ten spring-loaded contacts are maintained in one dual-row housing.
Female terminology should only be used after the complete mating architecture has been confirmed. A spring-loaded contact interface does not automatically define the connector as a conventional female receptacle.
The exact pitch should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before PCB layout release.
The finished-hole diameter depends on the approved tail diameter, PCB fabrication tolerance and soldering process. Use the released PCB footprint rather than estimating dimensions from product images.
Current capability is project-specific and should be evaluated across the PCB, solder joints, bent tails, pogo contacts, mating interface and complete load path.
Project-specific tail length, bend geometry, contact spacing and housing dimensions can be reviewed according to PCB layout, enclosure space and mating requirements.
If this 10-pin dual-row right-angle connector architecture is close to your device requirements, submit the PCB layout, available space, mating direction, pin map, working stroke and electrical conditions for engineering review.
Request Custom Quote & Samples | Browse Pogo Pin Connectors
This product page presents a CTP magnetic connector configuration for engineering reference. Final dimensions, electrical ratings, materials, magnet structure, sealing level and reliability targets are not universal values; they are confirmed against the approved drawing, installation condition and model-specific validation plan.
CTP reviews the application and prepares a drawing or specification for approval before sample production. Test scope, acceptance criteria and report format should identify the model, sample status, method, conditions, result and review date.
Yes. Customization can cover geometry, contact layout, materials, cable construction, magnetic structure, sealing and appearance. Feasibility depends on the application and approved specification.
No. Current, voltage, resistance, temperature rise and ingress-protection claims apply only to the identified model and stated test conditions.
Timing is confirmed after the drawing, materials, tooling, sample quantity, validation scope and production requirements have been reviewed.
The development route depends on whether an existing pogo pin can be used, modified or assembled into a customized multi-contact connector.
Confirm product type, dimensions, stroke, force, current, mounting and project quantity.
Match the contact geometry, tail structure, housing, Pin layout and installation method.
Confirm dimensional tolerances, material requirements and sample configuration.
Review electrical, mechanical, assembly and application-specific validation conditions.
Submit the product type, dimensions, mounting method, working stroke, spring-force condition, electrical requirements, Pin Map, PCB layout and available drawings for project review.
Our high-precision pogo pin connectors can be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of industries. Explore our core application areas below. Feel free to contact our engineering team for custom solutions.
TWS Earbuds & Watches
Healthcare Equipment
High Current Systems
Data Transmission
IoT & LED Lighting
Review related products by mounting method, contact geometry, Pin count, assembly structure and project requirements.
