Individual Pogo Pin
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →
Determine whether the project needs a single spring-loaded contact, a multi-contact connector assembly, a specific mounting method or a customer-defined mechanical interface.
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →A complete multi-contact assembly combining pogo pins, insulating housing, contact pitch and mounting structure.
Browse Connector Assemblies →Choose through-hole, surface mount, right-angle, double-ended or customer-specific termination.
Review Engineering Guides →Define travel, spring force, current path, housing, Pin Map and device-side mechanical constraints.
Submit Project Requirements →This 6-pin PCB pogo pin connector integrates six spring-loaded electrical contacts into a compact 3 × 2 dual-row housing with straight PCB tails. The dual-row architecture reduces the contact-array length compared with a 1 × 6 single-row arrangement while maintaining six independently assignable electrical positions.
Each spring-loaded contact provides electrical connection and controlled compliance along the contact axis. Final connector position, contact compression and mechanical seating should be established by the PCB, mating target and device-level mechanical structure rather than by using the pogo contacts as structural stops.
Six spring-loaded contacts are arranged as three positions across two parallel rows. This compact contact field distinguishes the connector from longer single-row 6-position pogo connector assemblies.
Exact contact pitch, row spacing, pin numbering and contact-center coordinates should be confirmed from the approved product drawing before PCB layout or mating-target design is released.
Straight metallic tails extend from the rear of the connector housing for PCB integration. The visible structure is consistent with through-hole style mounting, but final PCB hole dimensions, pad geometry, tail diameter and insertion depth should follow the approved connector drawing.
PCB dimensions should not be estimated from product photography because small variations in tail diameter, spacing and housing position can affect assembly fit and connector alignment.
This product is a multi-contact pogo pin connector assembly rather than six individually installed spring-loaded contacts. The housing maintains the six contacts in one defined 3 × 2 geometry.
Engineers should evaluate the complete housing, PCB footprint, contact geometry, working stroke, mating target and tolerance stack-up as one interface.
Mechanical design should consider PCB position, housing dimensions, mating direction, target-contact geometry and available assembly tolerance. Device-level datums and mechanical stops should define the final mating position.
Each pogo contact should operate within the working stroke defined by the approved connector drawing. Working stroke is the intended operating compression range and should not be confused with the total available mechanical travel of the contact.
The final device structure should provide the mechanical stop so that the pogo contacts operate within their intended compression range rather than serving as structural stops.
Six physical contacts provide six available electrical positions, but pin count does not determine their functions. Power, return, control, sensing, identification or signal functions should be assigned through the approved customer pin map.
A clear Pin 1 reference and viewing direction should be included because a 3 × 2 dual-row array can be interpreted differently from the PCB side and mating side.
Current capability should be evaluated across the complete conductive path:
Source → PCB copper → through-hole solder joint → connector tail → pogo contact → mating interface → target conductor → load.
Pin count and visible contact diameter alone are not sufficient to establish an approved current rating. PCB copper, solder-joint resistance, connector resistance, mating resistance and temperature rise should be considered together.
Multiple contacts can be evaluated in parallel for a project-specific electrical architecture, but total current should not be calculated by simply multiplying a single-contact rating by the number of parallel contacts.
PCB routing, solder-joint resistance, contact-resistance variation, mating geometry and current sharing should be reviewed together.
A 6-pin connector does not automatically support a particular data rate, protocol or communication interface.
Signal capability depends on the approved pin map, ground and return-path allocation, contact geometry, contact pitch, PCB transition, mating target and complete electrical channel.
This compact 3 × 2 connector architecture can be evaluated for PCB-mounted electrical interfaces requiring six independently assigned spring-contact positions while keeping the contact array shorter than a single-row 6-position connector.
Application suitability depends on available PCB space, mating-target geometry, contact assignment, working stroke, electrical conditions and mechanical tolerance.
Contact material, plating, cycle life, housing flammability, operating temperature and compliance status should only be published when supported by approved specifications or validation records.
A black plastic housing does not establish a UL94 rating, and a gold-colored contact surface does not establish a gold-plating composition or thickness.
CTP can review project-specific requirements for contact count, contact pitch, row spacing, housing dimensions, PCB-tail geometry, footprint, working stroke, spring-force condition, pin assignment and mating-target geometry.
Final mechanical and electrical specifications should be released through an approved connector drawing.
The connector uses a 3 × 2 dual-row contact arrangement, providing six spring-loaded contact positions within one compact housing.
Both configurations provide six contact positions, but the 3 × 2 dual-row architecture uses two rows and can reduce the overall contact-array length. The correct layout depends on available PCB space and mating geometry.
The visible connector uses straight rear PCB tails consistent with through-hole style integration. Final hole diameter, pad dimensions and PCB footprint should follow the approved product drawing.
The exact contact pitch and row spacing should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before PCB layout release.
Working stroke is defined by the approved spring-contact design and should be distinguished from the contact’s total available mechanical travel.
Current capability is project-specific and should be evaluated across the PCB, solder joints, connector tails, pogo contacts, mating interface and complete load path.
Parallel contact assignments can be evaluated, but current sharing, resistance variation, PCB routing and temperature rise should be included in the design review.
No. Pin count alone does not determine data capability. Signal performance depends on the pin map, return paths, contact geometry, PCB transition and complete electrical channel.
Contact pitch, row spacing, housing dimensions, tail geometry and other interface parameters can be reviewed for project-specific PCB and mating requirements.
If this compact 6-pin dual-row PCB connector architecture is close to your device requirements, submit the PCB footprint, contact pitch, row spacing, pin map, working stroke, mating target and electrical conditions for engineering review.
Request Custom Quote & Samples | Browse Pogo Pin Connectors
This product page presents a CTP magnetic connector configuration for engineering reference. Final dimensions, electrical ratings, materials, magnet structure, sealing level and reliability targets are not universal values; they are confirmed against the approved drawing, installation condition and model-specific validation plan.
CTP reviews the application and prepares a drawing or specification for approval before sample production. Test scope, acceptance criteria and report format should identify the model, sample status, method, conditions, result and review date.
Yes. Customization can cover geometry, contact layout, materials, cable construction, magnetic structure, sealing and appearance. Feasibility depends on the application and approved specification.
No. Current, voltage, resistance, temperature rise and ingress-protection claims apply only to the identified model and stated test conditions.
Timing is confirmed after the drawing, materials, tooling, sample quantity, validation scope and production requirements have been reviewed.
The development route depends on whether an existing pogo pin can be used, modified or assembled into a customized multi-contact connector.
Confirm product type, dimensions, stroke, force, current, mounting and project quantity.
Match the contact geometry, tail structure, housing, Pin layout and installation method.
Confirm dimensional tolerances, material requirements and sample configuration.
Review electrical, mechanical, assembly and application-specific validation conditions.
Submit the product type, dimensions, mounting method, working stroke, spring-force condition, electrical requirements, Pin Map, PCB layout and available drawings for project review.
Our high-precision pogo pin connectors can be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of industries. Explore our core application areas below. Feel free to contact our engineering team for custom solutions.
TWS Earbuds & Watches
Healthcare Equipment
High Current Systems
Data Transmission
IoT & LED Lighting
Review related products by mounting method, contact geometry, Pin count, assembly structure and project requirements.
