Individual Pogo Pin
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →
Custom 30-pin pogo pin connector with a 1 × 30 single-row spring-contact arrangement for long, narrow multi-contact electrical interfaces. The integrated housing maintains thirty contact positions as one connector assembly, while each spring-loaded contact provides electrical connection and controlled Z-axis compliance. Contact pitch, mounting structure, PCB interface, working stroke and electrical ratings are defined by the approved project drawing.
Determine whether the project needs a single spring-loaded contact, a multi-contact connector assembly, a specific mounting method or a customer-defined mechanical interface.
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →A complete multi-contact assembly combining pogo pins, insulating housing, contact pitch and mounting structure.
Browse Connector Assemblies →Choose through-hole, surface mount, right-angle, double-ended or customer-specific termination.
Review Engineering Guides →Define travel, spring force, current path, housing, Pin Map and device-side mechanical constraints.
Submit Project Requirements →This 30-pin single-row pogo pin connector integrates thirty spring-loaded electrical contacts into one long linear housing. The 1 × 30 architecture is intended for multi-contact interfaces where many independently assigned contact positions are required along a narrow connector envelope.
The integrated housing maintains the relative contact positions as one connector assembly. Each spring-loaded contact provides electrical connection and controlled compliance along the contact axis, while final positioning and mechanical seating should be established by the approved device structure.
Thirty contact positions are arranged in one continuous row. This creates a long linear electrical interface rather than the wider footprint associated with dual-row connector architectures.
Exact contact pitch, overall array length, pin numbering and contact-center coordinates should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before the mating interface or PCB layout is released.
This product is a complete pogo pin connector assembly rather than thirty individual spring-loaded contacts. The housing controls the relative contact spacing and maintains the thirty positions as one mechanical unit.
Engineers should therefore evaluate the complete connector geometry, mounting method, mating target, working stroke and tolerance stack-up rather than treating each contact independently.
The final mounting and termination structure should be confirmed from the approved drawing. Product photography alone is not sufficient to determine whether the connector uses SMT, through-hole or another project-specific PCB interface.
If surface-mount integration is required, the PCB land pattern, solder-pad geometry, coplanarity and assembly process should be reviewed together. If through-hole termination is used, tail dimensions, hole diameter and PCB thickness should instead be defined by the released footprint.
A 30-position single-row connector creates a longer contact array than lower-pin-count designs. Mechanical integration should therefore consider connector straightness, mating-surface flatness, contact-height consistency, housing support and tolerance accumulation across the complete interface length.
Device-level datums and mechanical stops should establish the final mating position. The pogo contacts should provide controlled electrical-contact compliance rather than act as structural stops.
Each pogo contact should operate within the working stroke defined by the approved connector drawing. Working stroke is different from total available travel.
For a long 30-contact array, the mating structure should also control parallelism and flatness so that compression remains appropriate across the full row rather than relying on excessive travel at individual contact positions.
Thirty physical contact positions provide thirty available electrical nodes, but pin count does not determine their functions. Power, return, sensing, control, identification and signal functions should be defined through the approved customer pin map.
Pin numbering should include a clear viewing direction and Pin 1 reference because a long symmetric row can otherwise create orientation ambiguity between the connector, PCB and mating target.
Current capability should be evaluated across the complete conductive path:
Source → PCB or conductor → connector termination → pogo contact → mating interface → target conductor → load.
Neither thirty contacts nor the visible contact diameter establishes an approved current rating. Conductor geometry, termination resistance, pogo-contact resistance, mating resistance and temperature rise should be considered together.
Multiple contact positions can be evaluated in parallel when required by the electrical architecture, but the allowable current should not be calculated by simply multiplying a single-contact rating by the number of parallel pins.
Current sharing, PCB routing, contact-resistance variation, mating geometry and thermal conditions should be reviewed across the complete path.
A 30-pin connector provides more available contact positions, but it does not automatically provide higher data bandwidth or support a specific communication protocol.
Data capability depends on the actual pin map, ground and return-path allocation, contact pitch, contact geometry, PCB transition, cable or FPC if present, mating target and the complete electrical channel.
This 1 × 30 connector architecture can be evaluated for long, narrow electrical interfaces requiring thirty independently assigned spring-contact positions in one connector assembly.
Application suitability depends on available installation length, mounting structure, mating-target flatness, contact assignment, working stroke, electrical conditions and mechanical tolerance.
Contact material, plating, cycle life, corrosion requirements, operating temperature and compliance status should only be published when supported by approved specifications or validation records.
A gold-colored contact surface does not establish gold-plating composition or thickness, and the visible connector geometry does not establish durability or environmental performance.
CTP can review project-specific requirements for contact count, contact pitch, connector length, mounting structure, termination geometry, working stroke, spring-force condition, pin assignment and mating-target design.
Final mechanical and electrical specifications should be released through an approved connector drawing.
The connector uses a 1 × 30 single-row architecture, with thirty spring-loaded contact positions arranged along one linear housing.
The connector housing maintains the relative spacing of all thirty contacts as one mechanical assembly, reducing the need to position thirty individual contacts independently.
The mounting and termination structure should be confirmed from the approved product drawing. The main product image alone is not sufficient to establish an SMT footprint.
Contact pitch should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before the PCB or mating target is designed.
No. Pin count does not establish current capability. Current must be evaluated across the complete conductive path and according to the actual pin assignment and thermal conditions.
Parallel contacts can be evaluated for a project-specific design, but current sharing, contact-resistance variation, PCB routing and temperature rise should be reviewed.
Pin count alone does not establish data bandwidth. Signal capability depends on the pin map, return paths, contact geometry, pitch, PCB transition and the complete channel.
Mating-surface flatness, connector straightness, parallelism and compression consistency should be considered across the full contact-array length.
Project-specific contact count, pitch, housing length and termination structure can be reviewed against the required installation space and mating interface.
If this 30-pin single-row connector architecture is close to your interface requirements, submit the available length, contact pitch, mounting structure, pin map, working stroke, mating target and electrical conditions for engineering review.
Request Custom Quote & Samples | Browse Pogo Pin Connectors
This product page presents a CTP magnetic connector configuration for engineering reference. Final dimensions, electrical ratings, materials, magnet structure, sealing level and reliability targets are not universal values; they are confirmed against the approved drawing, installation condition and model-specific validation plan.
CTP reviews the application and prepares a drawing or specification for approval before sample production. Test scope, acceptance criteria and report format should identify the model, sample status, method, conditions, result and review date.
Yes. Customization can cover geometry, contact layout, materials, cable construction, magnetic structure, sealing and appearance. Feasibility depends on the application and approved specification.
No. Current, voltage, resistance, temperature rise and ingress-protection claims apply only to the identified model and stated test conditions.
Timing is confirmed after the drawing, materials, tooling, sample quantity, validation scope and production requirements have been reviewed.
The development route depends on whether an existing pogo pin can be used, modified or assembled into a customized multi-contact connector.
Confirm product type, dimensions, stroke, force, current, mounting and project quantity.
Match the contact geometry, tail structure, housing, Pin layout and installation method.
Confirm dimensional tolerances, material requirements and sample configuration.
Review electrical, mechanical, assembly and application-specific validation conditions.
Submit the product type, dimensions, mounting method, working stroke, spring-force condition, electrical requirements, Pin Map, PCB layout and available drawings for project review.
Our high-precision pogo pin connectors can be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of industries. Explore our core application areas below. Feel free to contact our engineering team for custom solutions.
TWS Earbuds & Watches
Healthcare Equipment
High Current Systems
Data Transmission
IoT & LED Lighting
Review related products by mounting method, contact geometry, Pin count, assembly structure and project requirements.
