Individual Pogo Pin
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →
Custom 8-pin pogo pin connector with a compact 4 × 2 dual-row spring-contact arrangement for multi-contact electrical interfaces. The integrated housing maintains eight contact positions as one connector assembly, while the spring-loaded contacts provide electrical connection and controlled Z-axis compliance. Contact pitch, PCB termination, working stroke, pin assignment and electrical ratings are defined by the approved project drawing.
Determine whether the project needs a single spring-loaded contact, a multi-contact connector assembly, a specific mounting method or a customer-defined mechanical interface.
A single spring-loaded contact supplied for integration into the customer’s PCB, housing or connector structure.
Browse Individual Pogo Pins →A complete multi-contact assembly combining pogo pins, insulating housing, contact pitch and mounting structure.
Browse Connector Assemblies →Choose through-hole, surface mount, right-angle, double-ended or customer-specific termination.
Review Engineering Guides →Define travel, spring force, current path, housing, Pin Map and device-side mechanical constraints.
Submit Project Requirements →This 8-pin pogo pin connector integrates eight spring-loaded electrical contacts into a compact 4 × 2 dual-row housing. The architecture provides multiple independently assignable contact positions in a short connector block rather than requiring eight individual pogo contacts to be installed and positioned separately.
Each spring-loaded contact provides electrical connection and controlled compliance along the contact axis. Final connector position, working compression and mechanical seating should be established by the approved PCB, enclosure and mating structure rather than by using the pogo contacts as structural stops.
Eight contact positions are arranged as four positions across two parallel rows. This creates a compact multi-contact interface with a shorter overall contact-array length than a comparable single-row 8-position structure.
Exact contact pitch, row spacing, pin numbering and contact-center coordinates should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before PCB or mating-interface design is released.
This product is a complete pogo pin connector assembly rather than eight individual spring-loaded contacts. The housing maintains the relative position of all eight contacts in a defined 4 × 2 array.
The complete housing, contact geometry, mounting structure, mating target and tolerance stack-up should therefore be evaluated as one interface.
The exact PCB mounting and termination structure should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing. Product photography alone is not sufficient to establish an SMT, SMD or through-hole PCB footprint.
If surface-mount termination is confirmed, the PCB land pattern, solder-pad dimensions, coplanarity and assembly conditions should be reviewed together. Other termination structures should follow their corresponding released mechanical and PCB drawings.
The connector should be reviewed together with the available PCB area, enclosure geometry, mating target and contact compression direction. Mechanical datums and device-level stops should establish the final relationship between the connector and mating surface.
Each pogo contact should operate within the working stroke specified by the approved connector drawing. Working stroke is different from total available mechanical travel.
The mating structure should define the final mechanical stop so the spring-loaded contacts provide controlled electrical-contact compliance without acting as structural stops.
Eight physical contacts provide eight available electrical positions, but the pin count does not determine their functions. Power, return, control, sensing, identification or signal functions should be assigned through the approved customer pin map.
Pin numbering should include a clear viewing direction and Pin 1 reference because a 4 × 2 array can otherwise create ambiguity between the connector side, PCB side and mating interface.
Current capability should be evaluated across the complete conductive path:
Source → PCB or conductor → connector termination → pogo contact → mating interface → target conductor → load.
Neither the number of contacts nor visible contact diameter is sufficient to establish an approved current rating. PCB copper, termination resistance, pogo-contact resistance, mating resistance and temperature rise should be included in the electrical review.
Multiple contacts can be evaluated in parallel when required by the project electrical architecture, but total current should not be calculated by simply multiplying one contact rating by the number of parallel pins.
Current sharing, PCB routing, contact-resistance variation, mating geometry and thermal conditions should be evaluated together.
An 8-pin connector provides eight physical contact positions but does not automatically define data capability, communication protocol or signal bandwidth.
Signal performance depends on the approved pin map, return-path allocation, contact pitch, contact geometry, PCB transition, mating target and complete electrical channel.
This compact 4 × 2 connector architecture can be evaluated for electrical interfaces requiring eight independently assigned spring-contact positions within a relatively short connector envelope.
Application suitability depends on available PCB and enclosure space, mounting structure, mating-target geometry, pin assignment, working stroke, electrical conditions and mechanical tolerance.
Contact material, plating, cycle life, corrosion requirements, operating temperature and compliance status should only be published when supported by approved specifications or validation records.
Gold-colored contact surfaces do not by themselves establish a gold-plating specification, plating thickness or corrosion rating.
CTP can review project-specific requirements for contact pitch, row spacing, housing dimensions, PCB termination, working stroke, spring-force condition, pin assignment and mating-interface geometry.
Final mechanical and electrical specifications should be released through an approved connector drawing.
The connector uses a 4 × 2 dual-row architecture, providing eight spring-loaded contact positions within one compact housing.
It is a multi-contact pogo pin connector assembly. The housing maintains eight spring-loaded contacts in one defined 4 × 2 arrangement.
The exact mounting and termination structure should be confirmed from the approved connector drawing before PCB layout release.
The exact contact pitch and row spacing should be confirmed from the approved product drawing rather than estimated from the product image.
Current capability is project-specific and should be evaluated across the complete conductive path, including PCB conductors, termination, pogo contacts, mating interface and target load.
Parallel contacts can be evaluated for a project-specific design, but current sharing, contact-resistance variation, PCB routing and temperature rise should be considered.
Pin count alone does not define communication capability. Signal performance depends on the pin map, return paths, contact geometry, PCB transition and complete electrical channel.
Project-specific contact count, pitch, row spacing, housing dimensions and termination geometry can be reviewed against the required PCB and mating interface.
If this compact 8-pin dual-row connector architecture is close to your device requirements, submit the available space, PCB interface, pin map, working stroke, mating target and electrical conditions for engineering review.
Request Custom Quote & Samples | Browse Pogo Pin Connectors
This product page presents a CTP magnetic connector configuration for engineering reference. Final dimensions, electrical ratings, materials, magnet structure, sealing level and reliability targets are not universal values; they are confirmed against the approved drawing, installation condition and model-specific validation plan.
CTP reviews the application and prepares a drawing or specification for approval before sample production. Test scope, acceptance criteria and report format should identify the model, sample status, method, conditions, result and review date.
Yes. Customization can cover geometry, contact layout, materials, cable construction, magnetic structure, sealing and appearance. Feasibility depends on the application and approved specification.
No. Current, voltage, resistance, temperature rise and ingress-protection claims apply only to the identified model and stated test conditions.
Timing is confirmed after the drawing, materials, tooling, sample quantity, validation scope and production requirements have been reviewed.
The development route depends on whether an existing pogo pin can be used, modified or assembled into a customized multi-contact connector.
Confirm product type, dimensions, stroke, force, current, mounting and project quantity.
Match the contact geometry, tail structure, housing, Pin layout and installation method.
Confirm dimensional tolerances, material requirements and sample configuration.
Review electrical, mechanical, assembly and application-specific validation conditions.
Submit the product type, dimensions, mounting method, working stroke, spring-force condition, electrical requirements, Pin Map, PCB layout and available drawings for project review.
Our high-precision pogo pin connectors can be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of industries. Explore our core application areas below. Feel free to contact our engineering team for custom solutions.
TWS Earbuds & Watches
Healthcare Equipment
High Current Systems
Data Transmission
IoT & LED Lighting
Review related products by mounting method, contact geometry, Pin count, assembly structure and project requirements.
