Magnetic Mating Interface
Confirm Pin count, contact allocation, magnet arrangement, connector shape, polarity control and mating direction.
Custom 6-pin magnetic charging cable with a compact 3 × 2 dual-row contact layout and separate open-frame mating component. The magnetic structure assists capture and retention, while final seating is defined by the approved mechanical interface. Pin assignment, cable construction, charging current, working stroke and magnetic requirements are defined by the approved project design.
The finished assembly must define the magnetic mating component, internal conductor arrangement, cable construction and the opposite-end connection as one complete electrical system.
Confirm Pin count, contact allocation, magnet arrangement, connector shape, polarity control and mating direction.
Define cable length, conductor count, wire specification, shielding requirements, jacket and flexibility.
Select USB, Type-C, DC plug, bare wire, terminal, PCB connection or another customized termination.
Confirm installation space, outlet direction, strain relief, exposed-contact state and user operation.
This 6-pin magnetic charging cable uses a compact 3 × 2 dual-row contact layout with an integrated black cable and a separate open-frame mating component. The six physical contact positions provide a compact electrical interface for project-defined charging functions.
The magnetic structure assists initial capture and retention. Final seating should be established by the approved mechanical interface, while the spring-loaded contacts provide electrical connection and controlled axial compliance.
Six electrical contact positions are arranged in a compact 3 × 2 matrix rather than a long single row. This architecture allows six project-defined electrical positions to be integrated into a relatively short rectangular mating face.
Pin count alone does not determine the electrical function of the contacts. Power, return, sensing, identification or control functions should follow the approved six-contact pin map.
This product should be distinguished from a standalone magnetic connector. The cable, cable-head termination, magnetic mating interface, device-side component and opposite-end termination form one complete electrical system.
Cable conductor size, cable length, termination resistance and contact-interface resistance can all affect voltage drop, temperature rise and charging performance.
The complete pin map should define every contact position, Pin 1 location and the viewing direction used for both mating components.
Six contacts should not automatically be interpreted as a fixed combination of power, ground, data or sensing functions.
Charging current should be evaluated across the complete conductive path:
Power Source → Opposite-End Termination → Cable Conductors → Cable-Head Termination → Spring Contact → Magnetic Mating Interface → Device-Side Contact → PCB → Charging Circuit → Load.
Contact size or a previous product-page current claim is not sufficient to establish an approved continuous-current rating.
For a complete path resistance Rpath, voltage drop follows Vdrop = I × Rpath and resistive power loss follows Ploss = I² × Rpath.
If multiple contacts are assigned in parallel for a charging path, total current capability should not be calculated by simply multiplying an individual-contact current value.
Contact-resistance variation, cable conductor resistance, PCB copper geometry, contact compression and temperature rise can affect current sharing between parallel paths.
This product is intended for charging applications, but the allowable voltage, continuous current, peak current and charging power should be established for the complete cable and device system.
Fast-charging terminology should only be used when the required charging architecture, electrical path and thermal performance are confirmed.
The presence of six electrical contacts does not by itself establish USB, high-speed data or another communication protocol.
If data functions are required, the project should define the signal contacts, return paths, data protocol, cable construction and complete electrical channel.
Magnetic capture, mechanical seating and valid electrical connection should be treated as separate interface conditions.
Magnetic attraction alone should not be treated as proof that all six contacts have reached their intended electrical condition.
Four protruding cylindrical features are visible around the open-frame mating component. Their exact purpose cannot be established from the product image alone.
They should not be described as guide pins, locating pins, magnets, anti-mismating features or structural stops unless those functions are defined by the approved mechanical drawing.
The spring-loaded contacts should operate within the working stroke defined by the approved connector drawing. Working stroke is the intended operating compression range and should be distinguished from total available mechanical travel.
Final seating should be controlled by the mechanical structure rather than using the spring contacts as structural stops.
The visible cable has a black flat or ribbed external appearance. Internal conductor count, conductor size, shielding, jacket construction and electrical topology should follow the approved cable specification rather than being inferred from appearance.
Cable length and conductor resistance should be considered together with the required charging current and allowable voltage drop.
The opposite end of the cable is not shown in the reference image and should not be assumed. USB-A, USB-C, DC, bare-wire or another termination should only be published when confirmed by the approved cable assembly drawing.
Cycle life, ingress protection, salt-spray performance, operating temperature and material compliance should be published only when supported by the corresponding approved specification or validation record.
| Product Type | Magnetic Charging Cable Assembly |
|---|---|
| Pin Count | 6 Pin |
| Contact Layout | 3 × 2 Matrix |
| Row Configuration | Dual Row |
| Interface Shape | Compact Rectangular / Square-Like |
| Cable Appearance | Black, Flat / Ribbed |
| Mating Components | Cable Head + Open-Frame Mating Component |
| Contact Interface | Spring Contact Side + Flat Contact Side |
| Peripheral Mechanical Features | Visible, Function To Be Confirmed |
| Magnetic Function | Capture + Retention |
| Final Position / Seating | Defined by Mechanical Interface |
| Pin Assignment | Defined by Customer Pin Map |
| Charging Function | Project-Specific Charging Interface |
| Fast-Charging Capability | To Be Confirmed |
| Data Capability | To Be Confirmed |
| Cable Construction | Defined by Approved Cable Specification |
| Opposite-End Termination | To Be Confirmed |
| Working Stroke | Defined by Approved Drawing |
| Total Travel | Available on Request |
| Spring Force | Project-Specific |
| Current Capability | Project-Specific |
| Voltage | Project-Specific |
| Contact Resistance | To Be Confirmed |
| Complete Path Resistance | Project-Specific |
| Magnetic Retention | Project-Specific |
| Cycle Life | To Be Confirmed |
| IP Rating | To Be Confirmed at Assembly Level |
| Operating Temperature | Project-Specific |
This 6-pin dual-row magnetic charging cable architecture can be evaluated for electronic equipment requiring a detachable charging connection with a compact rectangular electrical interface.
Final suitability depends on the approved pin map, cable construction, charging load, mating geometry, magnetic behavior and device-level mechanical requirements.
CTP can review project-specific requirements for the six-contact pin map, cable length, conductor size, cable jacket, magnetic head dimensions, mating-component geometry, magnetic retention, opposite-end termination and strain-relief structure.
Six electrical contact positions are arranged in a compact 3 × 2 dual-row matrix.
Their functions are project-defined. Power, return, sensing, identification, control or other functions should be assigned through the approved six-contact pin map.
Not automatically. Six contacts provide six physical electrical positions, but data capability requires a defined pin map, signal architecture, cable construction and complete channel review.
Fast-charging capability should be confirmed from the complete electrical path, cable conductors, connector resistance, charging architecture and thermal requirements.
Parallel contacts can be evaluated, but current sharing, path resistance and temperature rise should be reviewed rather than multiplying an individual-contact current value.
Four cylindrical peripheral features are visible, but their exact mechanical or magnetic function should be confirmed from the approved drawing before they are described as locating pins, guides, magnets or stops.
The magnetic structure assists capture and retention. Final position and seating should be established by the approved mechanical interface.
Provide the six-contact pin map, voltage and current requirements, cable construction, opposite-end termination, mating geometry, magnetic requirements and available drawings for engineering review.
Submit the pin map, charging requirements, cable construction, mating dimensions, magnetic requirements and device drawings so CTP can review the complete cable interface.
Request Custom Quote & Samples | Review Related Magnetic Connector Interfaces
This product page presents a CTP magnetic cable assembly configuration for engineering reference. Final dimensions, electrical ratings, materials, magnet structure, sealing level and reliability targets are not universal values; they are confirmed against the approved drawing, installation condition and model-specific validation plan.
CTP reviews the application and prepares a drawing or specification for approval before sample production. Test scope, acceptance criteria and report format should identify the model, sample status, method, conditions, result and review date.
Yes. Customization can cover geometry, contact layout, materials, cable construction, magnetic structure, sealing and appearance. Feasibility depends on the application and approved specification.
No. Current, voltage, resistance, temperature rise and ingress-protection claims apply only to the identified model and stated test conditions.
Timing is confirmed after the drawing, materials, tooling, sample quantity, validation scope and production requirements have been reviewed.
A reference product image is not enough to define a cable assembly. Confirm the following information before drawing, sampling or quotation review.
The exact project route depends on whether an existing product can be used, modified or requires a new cable assembly design.
Confirm product scope, Pin Map, cable length, termination, quantity and application conditions.
Match magnetic contacts to conductors, source-side wiring and device-side functions.
Confirm dimensions, outlet direction, cable construction and required sample configuration.
Review electrical, mechanical and environmental conditions before production approval.
Submit the magnetic-end structure, electrical functions, cable length, conductor requirements, opposite-end interface, installation space and available drawings for project review.
Review related cable assemblies by contact count, shape, termination and project supply scope.
