Magnetic Mating Interface
Confirm Pin count, contact allocation, magnet arrangement, connector shape, polarity control and mating direction.
Custom 6-pin magnetic charging cable with a compact 3 × 2 dual-row contact interface for medical equipment projects. The magnetic structure assists capture and retention, while the spring-loaded contacts provide electrical connection and controlled Z-axis compliance. Pin assignment, cable construction, charging capability, magnetic separation behavior and medical-device integration requirements are defined by the approved project design.
The finished assembly must define the magnetic mating component, internal conductor arrangement, cable construction and the opposite-end connection as one complete electrical system.
Confirm Pin count, contact allocation, magnet arrangement, connector shape, polarity control and mating direction.
Define cable length, conductor count, wire specification, shielding requirements, jacket and flexibility.
Select USB, Type-C, DC plug, bare wire, terminal, PCB connection or another customized termination.
Confirm installation space, outlet direction, strain relief, exposed-contact state and user operation.
This 6-pin magnetic charging cable combines an integrated white cable with a compact rounded-rectangular magnetic interface and a separate device-side mating adapter. Six electrical contact positions are arranged in a 3 × 2 dual-row layout.
The magnetic structure assists initial capture and retention. Final seating should be established by the approved mechanical interface, while the spring-loaded contacts provide electrical connection and controlled Z-axis compliance.
This cable architecture can be evaluated for medical equipment projects that require a detachable charging interface. The six contact positions can be assigned according to the approved electrical requirements of the device.
Use in medical equipment is an application definition, not a medical-grade qualification. Device-level safety, compliance, cleaning, environmental and risk requirements should be defined and validated by the applicable project team.
Six physical electrical contacts are arranged as three positions across two rows. The compact 3 × 2 architecture provides six independently assignable contact positions within a short rounded-rectangular mating face.
Pin count alone does not establish charging topology, power allocation, sensing functions or communication capability. Exact contact pitch, row spacing and Pin 1 orientation should follow the approved drawing.
The complete 6-pin map should define the function of every contact. Power, return, sensing, identification, control or other electrical functions should not be inferred from the physical contact count.
If multiple contacts are assigned in parallel for a power path, current sharing should be reviewed across the complete cable and device system rather than calculated by simply multiplying an individual contact rating.
The finished assembly includes the cable conductors, cable-side magnetic head, internal termination, mating interface, device-side adapter and opposite-end connector as one complete electrical system.
Cable conductor size, cable length, termination resistance and connector resistance can all affect voltage drop, temperature rise and final charging performance.
Charging current should be evaluated across the complete conductive path:
Power Source → Opposite-End Connector → Cable Conductors → Cable-Head Termination → Spring Contact → Magnetic Mating Interface → Device-Side Contact → Device PCB → Charging Circuit → Load.
A previous 2A rating or visible contact size is not sufficient to establish an approved continuous-current capability.
For a complete path resistance Rpath, voltage drop follows Vdrop = I × Rpath and resistive power loss follows Ploss = I² × Rpath.
Voltage capability should be defined for the complete mating system. Cable-side and device-side components of the same electrical interface should not be published with conflicting voltage ratings without a documented engineering explanation.
Final voltage requirements should be reviewed together with contact spacing, insulation structure, PCB design and the approved device architecture.
Magnetic capture, final mechanical seating and valid electrical connection are related but different interface conditions.
Magnetic attraction alone does not establish a valid electrical connection.
For equipment that may benefit from a detachable cable connection, separation behavior should be evaluated according to the actual cable-pull direction and device installation.
Axial separation force, peel force and cable-angle behavior can produce different results. A stronger magnetic interface is not automatically better; retention should be balanced against the required release behavior.
The spring-loaded contacts should operate within the working stroke defined by the approved connector drawing. Working stroke is the intended operating compression range and should not be confused with total available travel.
The mechanical interface should control the final seating position so the pogo contacts do not function as structural stops.
Cable length, conductor count, conductor size, conductor material, jacket structure and flexibility should be selected according to the charging and device requirements.
The cable exit includes a visible transition structure, but final strain-relief capability, bend requirements and cable pull performance should be defined by the approved cable assembly design.
The opposite-end connector is not sufficiently clear in the reference image and should not be assumed. USB-A, USB-C, DC, bare-wire or another termination should only be published when confirmed by the approved cable drawing.
The opposite-end connector forms part of the complete current path and should be reviewed together with the required charging conditions.
A white cable, magnetic breakaway interface, selected materials or general environmental documentation do not by themselves establish medical-grade qualification.
Cleaning compatibility, material restrictions, electrical safety, mechanical requirements, environmental conditions and device-specific validation should be defined by the medical equipment project.
Cycle life, salt-spray performance, operating temperature, ingress protection and material compliance should only be published when supported by the corresponding approved specification or validation record.
Environmental claims should identify the tested assembly and test conditions rather than being inferred from connector appearance or material color.
This 6-pin magnetic charging cable architecture can be evaluated for medical equipment projects requiring a detachable charging connection with a compact six-contact interface.
Final suitability depends on electrical load, cable construction, device geometry, magnetic separation behavior, environmental requirements and the validation requirements of the completed medical equipment.
CTP can review project-specific requirements for cable color, cable length, conductor size, six-contact pin assignment, magnetic head dimensions, device-side adapter geometry, magnetic retention, breakaway behavior, opposite-end termination and strain relief.
Final electrical, mechanical and environmental parameters should be released through an approved cable assembly drawing and validation plan.
This cable is positioned for medical equipment projects, but medical-grade qualification is not established by the product image or application name alone. Final qualification depends on the approved device requirements and supporting validation.
Six electrical contacts are arranged in a compact 3 × 2 dual-row layout within the rounded-rectangular magnetic interface.
Their functions are project-defined. Power, return, sensing, identification, control or other functions should be assigned through the approved 6-pin map.
Voltage and current capability should be confirmed from the complete cable and device system. Existing page values should not be treated as approved ratings until the electrical path and test conditions are verified.
Magnetic separation behavior can be designed for the application, but axial separation, peel force, cable pull direction and device geometry should be reviewed together.
The magnets assist capture and retention. Final seating and alignment should be established by the approved mechanical interface, while the spring contacts provide electrical connection and controlled axial compliance.
No conclusion should be made from color alone. Cleaning-agent compatibility, jacket material and chemical resistance should be confirmed according to the device requirements.
Waterproof or IP performance should only be stated for a defined and tested complete assembly. The connector shape alone does not establish an ingress-protection rating.
Provide the 6-pin map, voltage, current, cable construction, cable length, opposite-end termination, device geometry, magnetic separation requirement, environment and available drawings for engineering review.
If this 6-pin magnetic charging cable architecture is close to your medical equipment project, submit the pin map, electrical requirements, cable construction, device-side geometry, magnetic requirements and validation conditions for engineering review.
Request Custom Quote & Samples | Review Related Magnetic Connector Interfaces
This product page presents a CTP magnetic cable assembly configuration for engineering reference. Final dimensions, electrical ratings, materials, magnet structure, sealing level and reliability targets are not universal values; they are confirmed against the approved drawing, installation condition and model-specific validation plan.
CTP reviews the application and prepares a drawing or specification for approval before sample production. Test scope, acceptance criteria and report format should identify the model, sample status, method, conditions, result and review date.
Yes. Customization can cover geometry, contact layout, materials, cable construction, magnetic structure, sealing and appearance. Feasibility depends on the application and approved specification.
No. Current, voltage, resistance, temperature rise and ingress-protection claims apply only to the identified model and stated test conditions.
Timing is confirmed after the drawing, materials, tooling, sample quantity, validation scope and production requirements have been reviewed.
A reference product image is not enough to define a cable assembly. Confirm the following information before drawing, sampling or quotation review.
The exact project route depends on whether an existing product can be used, modified or requires a new cable assembly design.
Confirm product scope, Pin Map, cable length, termination, quantity and application conditions.
Match magnetic contacts to conductors, source-side wiring and device-side functions.
Confirm dimensions, outlet direction, cable construction and required sample configuration.
Review electrical, mechanical and environmental conditions before production approval.
Submit the magnetic-end structure, electrical functions, cable length, conductor requirements, opposite-end interface, installation space and available drawings for project review.
Review related cable assemblies by contact count, shape, termination and project supply scope.
